tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-296992921515610203.post2045860995680114052..comments2010-02-09T19:54:23.911-08:00Shaun Garrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07612183408172392010dodgersrumors@gmail.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-296992921515610203.post-46282496933037916062010-02-09T19:54:23.911-08:002010-02-09T19:54:23.911-08:00I guess anything is possible these days. However I think Colletti has a fetish with washed up veterans, and throwing money down the toilet. Don&#39;t get me wrong, Giles is a good guy and I wouldn&#39;t mind him being the veteran clubhouse guy in 2010. The issue I have is how many of these guys do the Dodgers need lying around? Colletti couldn&#39;t have found something better to spend the money on? Also keep in mind for every player that has to be added to the 40 man roster, one has to be removed.Shaun Garrisonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07612183408172392010noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-296992921515610203.post-50628807037042294052010-02-09T12:48:23.110-08:002010-02-09T12:48:23.110-08:00Is it possible that Colletti is stocking these veterans hoping they won&#39;t make the big league club, but will provide leadership to the minor league teams? If that&#39;s the case, then 400K&#39;s not a bad investment for leadership, stability and big league advice to a bunch of promising talent. <br /><br />While Giles has an opt out clause, some of the other acquisitions don&#39;t.Rostomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14143455295081725634noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-296992921515610203.post-81318053850927751952010-02-08T16:56:09.851-08:002010-02-08T16:56:09.851-08:00Completely agreed! There seems to be so much young talent out there to be wasting time developing any veterans. The Dodgers should be concentrating on youth instead of hiring has beens. It has been an interesting offseason so far.PrinterRyanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02584819679486632854noreply@blogger.com